Thoroughly Tested. Stronger Than Ever.

SafeOpt and addShoppers have successfully defended ourselves against baseless accusations of privacy violations. We remain fully compliant, operational, and focused on delivering value to our partners and shoppers.

G2 Best Software 2025 Top 50 Commerce Products Award

All legal matters resolved

No findings of liability

SafeOpt is fully operational and compliant

Trusted by 1,000+
loyal brands

"SafeOpt is now the only proven solution tested in the courts. We have the most scale, are trusted by thousands of brands, and built to the highest standards of privacy and performance. We pioneered this space, and we will continue to lead it responsibly."
Jon West
CEO, addShoppers

Legal Matters Overview

Three separate legal challenges across the US, all dismissed by the courts with no findings of wrongdoing or liability.

Lineberry v. AddShopper, Inc.
Dismissed

April 2023 - June 2025

3:23-cv-01996

Jurisdiction:California
Court:U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

Federal lawsuit filed in Northern District of California. Case was dismissed by the court.

Key Outcome:

Case dismissed with no findings of liability

32 timeline eventsCase #1
Ingrao v. Addshoppers, Inc.
Dismissed

March 2024 - November 2024

2:24-cv-01022

Jurisdiction:Pennsylvania
Court:U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Federal lawsuit filed in Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Case was dismissed by the court.

Key Outcome:

Case dismissed with no findings of liability

7 timeline eventsCase #2
Cordero v. Sportsmans Warehouse
Dismissed

August 2024 - April 2025

2:24-cv-00575

Jurisdiction:Utah
Court:U.S. District Court, District of Utah

Federal lawsuit filed in District of Utah. Case was dismissed by the court.

Key Outcome:

Case dismissed with no findings of liability

4 timeline eventsCase #3

Detailed Timeline

Chronological view of all legal proceedings and milestones

April 2023

Lineberry v. AddShopper
filed

McClung et al v. AddShopper - Complaint Filed

On April 24, 2023, Plaintiffs McClung et al file a complaint against AddShopper (sic), Peets Coffee, and Every Man Jack (Defendants) in the Northern District of California alleging violations of California's wiretap act (CIPA) and other privacy-related claims.

March 2024

Ingrao v. Addshoppers
filed

Ingrao v. AddShoppers - Complaint Filed

Complaint filed in Eastern District of Pennsylvania against AddShoppers, Nutrisystems, and Vivent.

August 2024

Cordero v. Sportsmans Warehouse
filed

Cordero v. Sportsmans Warehouse - Complaint Filed

Complaint filed in District of Utah against Sportsman's Warehouse.

November 2024

Ingrao v. Addshoppers
CASE DISMISSED

All Claims Dismissed

Judge Slomsky dismisses all claims against all defendants. Plaintiffs had filed leave to amend to add new party.

April 2025

Cordero v. Sportsmans Warehouse
CASE DISMISSED

All Claims Dismissed

Court dismisses all claims against all defendants.

June 2025

Lineberry v. AddShopper
CASE DISMISSED

Case Formally Dismissed

Judge Chhabria formally dismisses the case on June 20, 2025.

"From the start, addShoppers has maintained that the plaintiffs' allegations misrepresent how our SafeOpt service actually works and overlook our efforts to minimize data collection in pursuit of helping shoppers save time and money. Ultimately, the plaintiffs couldn't substantiate their claims."
David Hale
General Counsel + Chief Privacy Officer

Press Coverage

Law360

Peet's Coffee, AddShoppers Beat Cert Bid In Privacy Suit

A federal judge denied class certification in a privacy lawsuit against Peet's Coffee and AddShoppers, dealing a significant blow to the plaintiffs' case.

May 2025Read More
JD Supra

Court Rejects Class Certification in Privacy Lawsuit

Federal court denied class certification in privacy litigation, highlighting the challenges plaintiffs face in establishing adequate class representation in technology-related privacy cases.

May 2025Read More
LexBlog

Collection of Website Visit Time Stamp Not Enough to Confer Article III Standing

A Utah federal court confirmed that collecting website visit timestamps alone does not create sufficient harm for Article III standing in privacy cases, referencing the Cordero v. Sportsman's Warehouse case.

June 2025Read More
Inside Class Actions

Pennsylvania Court Dismisses A Trio of Defendants in Website Wiretapping Suit Challenging Email Marketing Program

A Pennsylvania court dismissed a wiretapping complaint filed against AddShoppers and other defendants for lack of Article III standing, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim in Ingrao v. Addshoppers, Inc.

January 2025Read More

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear answers to common questions about our past legal matters

Legal Representation

addShoppers is represented by world-class legal professionals with deep expertise in technology law and privacy compliance.

David Hale, General Counsel + Chief Privacy Officer

David Hale

General Counsel + Chief Privacy Officer

Internal Counsel
Law Firm Logo
Tomio Narita, Partner

Tomio Narita

Partner

External Counsel
Law Firm Logo
Travis Campbell, Senior Counsel

Travis Campbell

Senior Counsel

External Counsel
Law Firm Logo
David Bertoni, Partner

David Bertoni

Partner

External Counsel
Law Firm Logo